Printed from: Society of Decision Professionals
  https://www.decisionprofessionals.com/

Print Page
Print

Knowledge Content Library

Exploring Management Options in the Grand Canyon with Formal Decision Analysis

Presenter: Michael Runge, US Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center

Presented at the 2016 DAAG Conference in Banff, Alberta, Canada.  Day 2 Keynote Address

Abstract: The Colorado River ecosystem between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead is important to many stakeholders, including: American Indian Tribes, whose creation stories begin there; citizens of the seven western Colorado River Basin states, who rely on the river for water and electricity; visitors from around the world, who raft, hike, camp, and fish in the extraordinary wilderness; and environmental advocates, who seek to conserve the species and ecosystems of this unique place. In January 2016, the Bureau of Reclamation and the National Park Service published a Draft Environmental Impact Statement concerning the long-term management of water releases from Glen Canyon Dam. In developing this draft EIS, the lead agencies used two formal decision analysis methods, multiple criteria decision analysis and the expected value of information, to evaluate seven alternative strategies against the 18 performance metrics and to evaluate the influence of uncertainty. Stakeholder agencies were invited to participate in a swing-weighting exercise to understand their range of perspectives; the results of the swing-weighting exercise were combined with the evaluation of the alternatives to complete a multicriteria decision analysis. Surprisingly, the rankings of the alternatives were not sensitive to the critical uncertainties that were evaluated, but the choice of a preferred alternative was sensitive to the value-based judgment about how to place relative weight on the resource goals. This work provides an example of how to use formal decision analysis methods in the context of an Environmental Impact Statement to integrate value judgments and scientific evidence in the evaluation of natural resource management alternatives.

Keywords: framing framestruc tools framtool, evaluation anamod, project execution projexec, multi-objective multobj, voi voivoc, USGS, EIS, swing weights swingwt, natural resource, consequences table conseqtab, stakeholder, water, environmental, tribes, alternatives generation altgen, multiple criteria

Download PDF

 


 

 
   Email Print

All Content Rights Reserved , Society of Decision Professionals
Captavi - SaaS CMS Platform ©